|
|
|
Maryland Slip And Fall LawMaryland slip and fall law is based on a fault system. That is, property owners are not automatically responsible if you fall and injure yourself on their property. Under Maryland slip and fall law, property owners are only responsible for dangerous conditions that they knew about (or should have know about if they had been paying attention) but did not correct or warn you about. ![]() Fall claims arise inside and outside. They occur on public property and on private property. They have many causes. These are some of the most common causes of INDOOR falls. . .
These are some of the most common causes of OUTSIDE falls. . .
Those of us who focus on Maryland slip and fall law usually describe slip and fall claims as having two components which we commonly call "liability" and "damages." A. LiabilityLiability means "Who caused the accident?" If you fall and injure yourself on someone else's property, the property owner is NOT automatically responsible, or liable, for your injuries. That's right. Not automatically responsible. In lawyer lingo, these are called "premises liability" cases. Property owners or occupiers (such as a tenant in a shopping center) must take reasonable steps to provide a safe "premises" for visitors. Property owners owe a higher duty to protect "invitees" (that are on the property for the benefit of the property owner -- such as a customer in a store) and "social guests" than they owe a "trespasser." In fact, the only duty owed to a trespasser under Maryland slip and fall Law is to not intentionally injure the trespasser. Cases are stronger if the property owner actually knew of the defect or clearly should have known of it. Some defective and dangerous conditions are long term or permanent conditions. Examples include poor lighting, abrupt changes in floor levels, or a gap or a hole in the flooring. These conditions obviously have existed long enough for the property owner to know about them. Falls because of these types of defects are usually strong cases under Maryland Slip and Fall Law. Other types of defects may be temporary or short term. Examples of this include slippery or sticky substances on the floor of a store. These cases are harder to prove under Maryland slip and fall Law. You have to be able to prove that the dangerous condition existed long enough for the property owner to know about it and have a fair chance to correct it. To distinguish between these two situations, let's look at two examples. Suppose you are walking in a grocery store and slip on an ice cream spill that you didn't see. Assume also that the spill occurred 1 minute before you slipped, was caused by another customer and had not yet been seen by employees of the store. In this example, the store did not have a fair chance to know about the spill and do anything about it. The store is not liable for your fall under Maryland slip and fall law. On the other hand, assume the same facts except that the ice cream is still on the floor, say, 6 hours after it was spilled. Under these facts, the sticky and slippery substance was on the floor long enough for the store to know about it, or, at least, long enough that the store should have known about it if it was doing periodic inspections as it should have. In this situation, under Maryland Slip and Fall Law the store is liable for your fall. Especially if you expect the cause of the accident to be challenged, your first concern after you fall is to nail down the evidence of what happened. Do as many of these things as you can . . .
If you decide to hire a Maryland slip and fall lawyer, you should do so as soon as possible to give your lawyer time to investigate and evaluate your claim. If you hire a Maryland slip and fall lawyer later, give your lawyer the evidence that you have saved to help your lawyer catch up to the "Bad Guys" who have been investigating the claim from the time that it happened. 1. DefensesThe insurance company for ther at-fault driver will probably raise defenses. One common defense is "contributory negligence." Another is "assumption of risk." Still another defense that is often raised is "causation." Let me explain these further. a. Contributory NegligenceUnfortunately, Maryland is one of only 4 states that has a very harsh rule called "contributory negligence." If it exists, contributory negligence defeats your claim. This means that if you contributed in any way to causing your fall, you have no claim against the property owner who was the primary cause of your fall. In theory, if you are only 1% responsible for causing your fall and someone else is 99% at fault, under Maryland slip and fall law you are not entitled to recover from the other person or company! Incidentally, the alternative to contributory negligence that exists in most states is called "comparative negligence," a much better and more fair rule. You might want to contact your state legislators and encourage them to adopt it. Under comparative negligence, which varies slightly among the states that have this rule, the fault of the two parties is "compared" and the one who is more at fault pays while the one who is less at fault has his or her claim reduced by the percentage of their fault. For example, if Jones is 90% responsible for causing a fall and Smith is 10% at fault, Smith can recover from Jones for her injuries, but Smith can only recover 90% of full compensation. She loses 10% of her recovery because she was 10% responsible for causing the fall. So, under Maryland slip and fall law, if you can prove that the other party caused your accident and that you did nothing to contribute to causing the accident, there is 'liability.' b. Assumption of Risk
In Maryland slip and fall law, assumption of risk means that you willingly and voluntarily assumed a known risk. If you did, you have no claim if the risk you assumed injured you. An example is walking on a snowy or icy surface. Since you knew it was slippery, with limited exceptions, you cannot recpver from the property owner or occupier if you slip and hurt yourself. You assumed the risk that would happen.
|
What Our Clients Say"My serious accident was devastating and I didn't know where to turn for help. After another lawyer referred me to you, you guided me through the process to a great result, much better than I expected. You were always there for me... You always made me feel like I was your only client." Deborah Morton
"My wife and I are extremely satisfied with the services you provided. I have never come across a lawyer who would take the time to explain in plain language what will be happening and what to expect. You are really one of a kind." Esteban Velasquez
"Although the circumstances of my accident were unusual, your expert advice, patience and superb negotiating skills allowed my case to be settled out of court for ...an amount that far exceeded our initial expectations. I am deeply appreciative of your representation..." Elizabeth Augustine
"Before I hired a lawyer, I interviewed quite a few, and you stood head and shoulders above the rest. You were very knowledgeable and professional. You also were personable, and made me feel at ease. I would recommend you to anyone. Your services were a 10 out of 10!" Al Blocker
"I'm glad you don't charge what your services are worth, because they're worth their weight in gold." Pat Smith
|
|
|
Enjoy This Site? Then why not use the button below, to add us to your favorite bookmarking service? |
||
|
| ||