Maryland Trials Explained
Maryland Trials Explained.
Your case has not settled, so you're going to trial. What exactly does that
mean? What happens at a trial?
Here are the basics.
Preliminary Matters
After the case begins, the judge will deal with "preliminary matters" if there are
any. These would be such things as last minute motions raising technical legal issues.
Jury Selection
After those are resolved, jury selection begins, if yours is a jury trial.
The potential jurors are brought into the courtroom and sworn in. The judge
makes introductory comments, explaining what the case is about and the jury selection
procedures that will be followed. You will probably be introduced to the prospective
jurors, being asked to stand.
Then, the potential jurors are asked questions in what is called voir dire. In
Maryland, the judge almost always asks the questions, usually based on questions
requested by the lawyers for each side.
In other states, the lawyers often get to
question potential jurors directly, but not in Maryland, and this is a significant
disadvantage for trial lawyers.
If any jurors reveal that they cannot be fair, they are excused "for cause."
Using information learned through voir dire and the little bit of information
provided about each potential juror such as name, address, age, occupation and
education your lawyer can strike (excuse) up to four potential jurors for no reason or
for any reason, and your lawyer does not have to say what the reasons are. He or she
simply exercises a "peremptory challenge" and eliminates a juror.
The first six jurors
who were not stricken by either side are seated as the jury in a civil case. If the case will last more
than 1 day, the judge will probably also seat 1 or more alternate jurors. The alternates
will hear all of the evidence and will replace any jurors who cannot complete the case
for any reason, such as illness. When jury deliberation begins at the end of the case,
the alternates who have not become one of the 6 jurors are excused. They do not
participate in deciding the case.
Opening Statements
After the jury is selected, opening statements are made.
The lawyer for the plaintiff -- the party bringing the suit -- speaks first, followed by
the lawyer for the defendant -- the person being sued. Or, the defense lawyer can elect
to wait until after the plaintiff's case is over to make an opening statement. Most
defense lawyers make an opening statement at the beginning of the trial.
Opening statements (not opening "arguments") are designed to tell the jurors
what the lawyers think the evidence will be. They are often compared to road maps or
tables of contents.
Evidence
Next, the evidence is presented, beginning with the evidence of the plaintiff.
Evidence consists of testimony given from the witness stand and exhibits
introduced into evidence.
When a witness is called to testify, the lawyer who called the witness questions
first. This is called direct examination. Then, the other lawyer can ask questions in
what is called cross examination. After the second lawyer questions the witness, the
first lawyer can ask more questions in a re-direct examination. Then the second lawyer
can ask more questions in a re-cross examination, and so on. Basically, the
questioning continues in alternating fashion until the lawyers run out of questions. The
judge is also allowed to ask questions. Some do and some don't.
Most exhibits are introduced through witnesses. The lawyer who wants the
exhibit to go into evidence offers it into evidence. If the other lawyer opposes the
exhibit being considered by the jury, that lawyer objects and the judge rules on the
objection.
When the plaintiff finishes calling all of the witnesses and introducing all of the
exhibits that it wants, it "rests."
Unless the judge rules that the plaintiff has not proven a case -- in which case
the trial is over -- the defendant presents its evidence, calling witnesses and introducing exhibits. The
same procedures are followed for the examination of witnesses and introduction of
evidence as are followed when the plaintiff is presenting evidence.
After the defense finishes its case, the plaintiff can present "rebuttal evidence" to
rebut (or contradict) the defense case.
Jury Instructions
After all of the evidence has been presented, there is usually a break so that the
judge can decide what instructions on the law to give to the jury.
Instructions involve the judge telling the jurors the law that applies to the case.
The jurors are told to accept this law as it is given to them by the judge, decide the facts
and reach conclusions about the case.
In most other states, the closing arguments of the lawyers precede the judge's
instructions on the law, but in Maryland the instructions come before the closing
arguments.
Closing Arguments
The first closing argument is made by the lawyer for the plaintiff. Then the
defense lawyer makes a closing argument. Finally, the lawyer for the plaintiff gets the
last word. The plaintiff's lawyer speaks first and last because it is the plaintiff that has
to prove the case. If the plaintiff does not prove his or her case, the plaintiff loses.
Therefore, the plaintiff's lawyer gets the advantage of arguing first and last.
Jury Deliberations
After arguments are completed, if the judge has not already done so, the judge
explains a little more about how deliberations are to be conducted and then the jurors
retire to the jury deliberation room to make their (unanimous) decision.
To learn more about Maryland Trials,
contact us.

|